- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 23:55:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
birtles has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-transforms] Spec and blink implementation of transform-box for SVG elements differ == The [spec says](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms/#transform-box), > "For SVG elements without an associated CSS layout box, the used value for border-box is view-box."[1] [Erik points out that](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2015JulSep/0075.html), > "It seems to me that a used value of 'fill-box' in this case would lead to more easily understood behavior than 'view-box'." I believe Chrome ships with a used value of fill-box. Firefox is not shipping transform-box (see Mozilla [bug 1208550](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208550) and [bug 1209061](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1209061)) because we are waiting to see if the spec changes or Chrome changes. I have been unable to get any answer from blink folk about whether or not they are going to change this (see [twitter thread](https://twitter.com/brianskold/status/783171076532514816)). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/857 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2017 23:55:48 UTC