W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > February 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] font-stretch is unfortunately named

From: CJ Dunn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:55:01 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-282883999-1488236099-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I agree that this is a confusing term and that font-width would be a 
much more accurate term. Especially as OT 1.8 Variable Font support 
increases, a logical name will be crucial for understanding what this 
property actually does. It refers to the width of a font and does not 
refer to mechanically stretching a font, therefore font-width is much 
more accurate. Please change the name to font-width.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cjdunn
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/551#issuecomment-282883999 
using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 27 February 2017 22:55:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:30:29 UTC