Shouldn't the term 'replaced elements' be clarified, too? The ["Rendering" section of HTML spec](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html) clearly places "Form controls" into "Non-replaced elements" list. Also, according to the current definition from CSS2.1+ > An element whose content is outside the scope of the CSS formatting model the `button` element, for example, doesn't fit to the replaced element definition, since its content is the regular HTML DOM subtree, styled with normal CSS by the CSS formatting rules. Moreover, form controls internally presented as UA Shadow DOM components styled with UA built-in styles still belong to the CSS formatting model, and therefore don't completely match the definition of 'replaced elements'. Doesn't the CSS definition of "replaced elements" need to be updated? -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-280012153 using your GitHub accountReceived on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 13:36:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:08 UTC