W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > February 2017

[csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] HTML should be an informative, rather than normative, bibliographic reference

From: Bert Bos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:21:20 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-205972599-1486491679-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
bert-github has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-display-3] HTML should be an informative, rather than 
normative, bibliographic reference ==
‘[HTML]’ is in the Normative References[1], but it seems the only 
mention of things defined by HTML is just after the words "For 
example" in section 2.5[2]. I think ‘[HTML]’ should be in the 
Informative References instead.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170126/#normative
[2] 
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170126/#box-generation


Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011 using your GitHub 
account
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 18:21:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:30:28 UTC