Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors4] Name the “functional pseudo-class like :matches() with 0 specificity”

> `:nospecificity` is ridiculously long and prevents any possibility of expansion in the future to allow setting specificity, as @tabatkins suggested.

At least the latter point could be avoided, of course, by using `:specificity()` instead. Nonetheless it's still very long and hard to write.

So, I also vote for `:is()`, even when it rather indicates a check and not something to _set_ the specificity.


GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 29 December 2017 12:19:53 UTC