> Yes, :matches() is solely syntactic sugar (tho with complex selector arguments, the expanded form can get *very* verbose - try to expand out `:matches(.a .b .c, .d .e .f)` fully and correctly). This example isn't very verbose. Consider `.a .b .c :matches(.d .e .f)`, which can be very verbose. -- GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1027#issuecomment-353277366 using your GitHub accountReceived on Thursday, 21 December 2017 07:22:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:21 UTC