Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] reconsider specificity rule for :matches()

> Yes, :matches() is solely syntactic sugar (tho with complex selector arguments, the expanded form can get *very* verbose - try to expand out `:matches(.a .b .c, .d .e .f)` fully and correctly).

This example isn't very verbose. Consider `.a .b .c :matches(.d .e .f)`, which can be very verbose.

GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 21 December 2017 07:22:52 UTC