W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] reconsider specificity rule for :matches()

From: Xidorn Quan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:22:50 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-353277366-1513840969-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Yes, :matches() is solely syntactic sugar (tho with complex selector arguments, the expanded form can get *very* verbose - try to expand out `:matches(.a .b .c, .d .e .f)` fully and correctly).

This example isn't very verbose. Consider `.a .b .c :matches(.d .e .f)`, which can be very verbose.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1027#issuecomment-353277366 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2017 07:22:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:21 UTC