- From: Xidorn Quan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:22:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Yes, :matches() is solely syntactic sugar (tho with complex selector arguments, the expanded form can get *very* verbose - try to expand out `:matches(.a .b .c, .d .e .f)` fully and correctly). This example isn't very verbose. Consider `.a .b .c :matches(.d .e .f)`, which can be very verbose. -- GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1027#issuecomment-353277366 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2017 07:22:52 UTC