- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:33:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@frivoal I think nobody suggested adding a flow-relative switch only for `overflow`. It's just that if flow-relative longhands are added for `overflow`, `overflow` syntax is changed to accept two values, and a flow-relative switch is added in #1282, then the switch should also work in `overflow`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2000#issuecomment-351727011 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2017 14:33:02 UTC