- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:38:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Loirooriol has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-flexbox] Leftover from #1920 == [CSS Flexbox](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#min-size-auto) says > To provide a more reasonable default minimum size for flex items, this specification introduces a new `auto` value as the initial value of the `min-width` and `min-height` properties defined in CSS 2.1. But since #1920 is is false, now this new initial value is defined in CSS Sizing. So Flexbox should say something similar to [CSS Grid](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#min-size-auto): > To provide a more reasonable default minimum size for flex items, this specification defines that the `auto` value of `min-width`/`min-height` applies an automatic minimum size in the main axis to flex items whose `overflow` is `visible` in the main axis. Additionally there is a problem with the bikeshed syntax, https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/206de7888ae48025ebda609f3c1dceec5e27d57e/css-flexbox-1/Overview.bs#L908 is displayed as `‘height: auto’`, which is so misleading. If you use the quote above, this paragraph should probably be deleted anyway. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 December 2017 23:39:04 UTC