- From: Greg Whitworth via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:20:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
We also haven't updated our implementation since 2015 for this section of spec text. By simply applying a definite `flex-basis` and a `height` of 0 in the demo above, this makes Chrome interoperable with Firefox and Edge. This leads me to wonder if the performance argument (what was brought up [~3 years](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0010.html) ago) is worth the author confusion here, and while I understand why inline & block direction are different - currently FF/Edge react the same for the author in either `row` or `column` directions which further makes me desire the implementations of FF/Edge. I think we may have done a bit of pre-optimization when discussing this in 2014, I truly think we should remove the constraints for 2 under section `9.8` as that's what we're doing. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gregwhitworth Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-324140324 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2017 20:20:24 UTC