- From: François REMY via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:51:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
FremyCompany has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-variables] Animation tainting text doesn't cover the cases where a property references a tainted property == I don't think the text in the spec covers this example: ``` div { animation: anim 1s infinite alternate; --var: block; --var2: var(--var); } div::after { content: "abc"; display: var(--var2); } @keyframes anim { to { --var: none; } } ``` https://drafts.csswg.org/css-variables/#substitute-a-var > If the custom property named by the first argument to the var() function is animation-tainted [...] > any custom property used in a @keyframes rule becomes animation-tainted, which affects how it is treated when referred to via the var() function in an animation property. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1737 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 23:51:07 UTC