- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:48:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Unlike VS-15, VS-16 is used a lot in the wild. Anyway, *maybe* `text` will indeed be enough for the icon font use case, because authors usually can control the presence of variation selectors there. If @litherum agrees with this resolution (and if `font-presentation` becomes `font-variant-emoji`), I expect and prefer this would go into the Text module instead if the WG ever changes their minds. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1144#issuecomment-323203746 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 21:48:34 UTC