Re: [csswg-drafts] Definiteness of flex items' main size depend on flex-basis's definiteness

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Definiteness of flex items' main size depend on flex-basis's definiteness`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Definiteness of flex items' main size depend on flex-basis's definiteness<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: The grid has a behavior where we calc size of rows and columns whcih could depend on content we then do a pass to layout the items. So if the grid item is stretch or % it will resolve, as will any child.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Seems like there are impl of flexbox with a similar effect where a flex item is considered definite even though spec says if flex-item size depends on content the % wont' resolve. TabAtkins and I are happy to define what impl want, but we need to know if this was intentional or not. It does require another pass.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Basically, we want impl feedback.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Specfically FF and Edge.<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/feedback/to say what they want us to put in the spec/<br>
&lt;dael> gregwhitworth: I was going to ask for another week if possible.<br>
&lt;dael> gregwhitworth: I was going to look into our code more. Unless Gecko has feedback now.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Next week is good.<br>
&lt;dael> Chris: Sounds good gregwhitworth. ANyone from FF, can they do input?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: dbaron CCed dholbert.<br>
&lt;dael> Chris: Great. We'll defer.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-322832325 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2017 16:48:35 UTC