- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:58:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-sizing] min-content size of percentage-sized replaced elements == We recently [resolved](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/951) that the min-content size of replaced elements with percentage size/max-size and an intrinsic aspect ratio is calculated from 300x150 and the aspect ratio. The upside is that we have a definition that isn't zero. The downside is that 300x150 is rarely a useful size, and isn't customizable. So I was just thinking, what if we try using the min-width/min-height instead (where possible, i.e. not when calculating the min-width/min-height value itself)? If either of them is not auto, use that plus the aspect ratio to calculate the min-content size, otherwise fall back to 300x150. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1722 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2017 20:58:27 UTC