- From: Chris Harvey via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:17:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm late to the game, but I was wondering if there had been any discussion on naming the function `angular-gradient()` instead of `conic-gradient()`? Seems to me that `angular` is a more "programmy/mathy" term, and goes well with the other polar parameter, `radial`. (A polar coordinate is defined by a radius and an angle, so these two terms complement each other.) The only explanation for why `conic` was chosen that I've come across was that, > … it [could] produce a pattern that looks like a cone observed from above. which, as illustrated in the spec, is not always the case. -- GitHub Notification of comment by chharvey Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1123#issuecomment-321431589 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2017 02:17:16 UTC