Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-timing] Names for keyword arguments to steps timing function

Brian earlier objected that `drop-start` is a little misleading; `steps(10, drop-start)` can be read as "create 10 frames, drop the start one" (so you end up with 9 frames). I find that a reasonable objection.

What about `skip-start`? I feel like that has slightly different implications. `steps(10, skip-start)` feels a little more likely to be correctly interpreted as "10 frames, skipping the start value".

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1680#issuecomment-319916286 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 3 August 2017 09:22:00 UTC