- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:08:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Not `value [ , value ]*`, just `[ , value ]*`. That's why I referenced comma omission rules. That's only equivalent to `<value>#` if there's no terms preceding it in the grammar; if so, a preceding comma is actually required. Like, `foo [, bar]*` matches `foo, bar, bar`, while `foo bar#` matches `foo bar, bar`. Also, it's *significantly* less readable / less obvious. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381#issuecomment-319399498 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2017 15:08:40 UTC