- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:05:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed More %s, and agreed to the following resolutions: ``` RESOLVED: no change ``` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> ``` <TabAtkins> Topic: More %s <TabAtkins> GitHub Topic: <TabAtkins> GitHub Topic: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/892 <TabAtkins> smfr: Does transform-box resolve this one as well? <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Yeah, should be. <TabAtkins> smfr: transform-box doesn't have a definitio nfo the gradient "size" tho. Perhaps it's not something you should be able to do. <TabAtkins> ChrisL: There's a default clip-path on the SVG root that's set to its bounding box. <TabAtkins> Rossen: Would the bounding box change if the clip-path was shrunk? <TabAtkins> ChrisL: No. <TabAtkins> Rossen: So no, there's no way to target the clip-path box. <TabAtkins> smfr: So a no-change? <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Seems like it yes. Everything is either handled by transform-box already, or doesn't have a use-case. <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: no change ``` </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/892#issuecomment-295523471 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 01:05:32 UTC