Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-1] Some comments on the non-scaling stroke spec text

The CSS Working Group just discussed Comments on Scaling Stroke, and agreed to the following resolutions:

```
RESOLUTION: Close both 930 and 929 with no change to transforms spec
```

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>

```
<dino> Topic: Comments on Scaling Stroke
<dino> Github Topic: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/930
<dino> also https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/929
<dino> smfr: two similar issues
<dino> smfr: current implementations draw nothing when the matrix is non-invertible
<dino> smfr: this is just for svg's non-scaling stroke
<dino> smfr: some comments want *something* to be drawn, but that would be a change to SVG
<dino> smfr: suggest keeping the current behaviour of drawing nothing
<dino> TabAtkins: agree
<dino> dbaron: i agree too. we'd need to work out what to draw.
<dino> Rossen: is this a spec change?
<dino> smfr: current spec doesn't say anything about non-scaling stroke
<dino> smfr: not sure where that should be covered
<dino> Rossen: sounds like we don't need to make a change in L1. Any change would have to be in the SVG specification.
<smfr> https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/coords.html#VectorEffectProperty
<dino> smfr: SVG 2 has some things to control the behaviour ^^
<Rossen> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/painting.html#non-scaling-stroke
<smfr> https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/painting.html#non-scaling-stroke
<dino> Rossen: I can't see anything in the non-scaling stroke text about this.
<dino> Rossen: OK. Seems that the consensus is that the Transforms L1 text doesn't need to mention this. If there is a change to SVG, it will happen elsewhere
<dino> RESOLUTION: Close both 930 and 929 with no change to transforms spec
```
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/930#issuecomment-295508619 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 00:25:09 UTC