- From: Loirooriol via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 01:38:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
OK, I stand corrected. I still think that repeating the terms you are defining inside the definition seem a circularity. But now I see the definition is about "inline-level content", and it references "inline-level box". So not exactly the same, but still a problem if the definition of "inline-level box" is "box that is inline-level content". What about this: > ***inline-level** content*: box or contiguous run of text that participates in inline layout. > ***block-level** content*: box that participates in block layout. Or > ***inline-level***: content that participates in inline layout. Note: can either be a box or text. > ***block-level***: content that participates in block layout. Note: necessarily must be a box. Possibly linking [inline formatting context](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#inline-formatting-context) and [block formatting context](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#block-formatting-context). -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 01:38:08 UTC