- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:48:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Multiple ::afters has been discussed before. It's been rejected only for lack of strong use-cases; it's not seen as anything bad. I... don't think it's defensible to claim that the mentioned technique isn't a hack? It's abusing two completely unrelated abilities to achieve a third unrelated thing, and has a number of arbitrary limitations/drawbacks, not intrinsically linked to the thing being achieved, as a result. That's more or less the definition of a hack. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1195#issuecomment-293717567 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2017 21:48:56 UTC