- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:17:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> As @Crissov commented, this is highly likely to be abused. As I said, a similar way to copy-protect a page is already available via `user-select`. Also `@media print` can be abused the same way. But you're right, the risk that this feature would abused is high. > this would significantly complicate how implementations deal with copying to the clipboard, as they would have to do a dedicated layout pass, which they currently do not do. The idea about the 'clipboard' media type could have been part of a larger discussion about specifying how implementations should deal with copying. (Currently they obviously differ a lot!) I'm not an implementer, but I would have assumed the technical part to be relatively easy, because the layout algorithm would mostly be the same as the one used for the screen or print layout. @fantasai in the [minutes from 2016-10-26](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0130.html): > It won't interact properly with the cascade since we want the default behavior to be a set of UA-defined behavior. I assume UAs would only be required to change the default style sheet for this and the cascade would work the same as now. > I'd like to close this as WONTFIX. Is that OK with you? I still think it would be good to have a way to influence clipboard layout in some way, but I can understand your disagreement on the proposed 'clipboard' media type. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/648#issuecomment-256896192 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 28 October 2016 11:17:46 UTC