W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color][css-tables] should 'opacity' be hoisted from the table box to its wrapper box

From: François REMY via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:28:18 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-256482442-1477517296-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I just checked and Chrome hoists 'overflow:hidden' too. You can see 
this by creating a positioned element crossing the caption, like here:

I therefore went ahead and added it to the list, though that is of 
course pending a resolution. I propose we make the values ```scroll```
 and ```auto``` behave as ```visible``` as this seems interoperable. I
 also propose to normatively reference this list so that they stay in 
sync (and maybe add a note at the bottom of this list in the 
transforms spec noting this list is referenced in css-tables-3)?

I still anticipate the easiest way to solve this class of problem is 
to put things on their head and have the table-wrapper-box use all 
properties by default and have the "table-grid-box" be the one that 
gets exceptionally the "background", "border" as well as a few other 
properties from its parent, but we will leave this discussion for 
later. Let's get the behavior defined, then we can debate whether 
there are better ways to spec it.

GitHub Notification of comment by FremyCompany
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 21:28:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:04 UTC