- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:48:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
SebastianZ has just created a new issue for
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:
== [css-fonts-3] Change @font-face and @font-feature-values syntax
definitions to use CSS syntax and link to those definitions ==
The current definition of the `<font-family>` type is:
> The name of a font family of choice such as Helvetica or Verdana in
the previous example.
And the `<feature-index>` and `<feature-value-name>` types are
currently defined like this:
> … the @font-feature-values rule is used to define values for a
specific font family or set of families that associate a font-specific
numeric `<feature-index>` with a custom `<feature-value-name>`, which
is then used in this property to select specific alternates
This is somewhat vague, as there are no references to the related
syntax definitions.
The definitions should be changed to use the syntax from the [CSS
Syntax Module](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-syntax/).
I.e. they may look like this:
```
@font-face = @font-face { <declaration-list> }
```
where `<declaration-list>` can only contain the @font-face
descriptors.
and
```
@font-feature-values = @font-feature-values <family-name># {
<rule-list> }
<family-name> = <string> | <custom-ident>+
<feature-value-block> = <feature-type> { <declaration-list> }
<feature-type> = @stylistic | @historical-forms | @styleset |
@character-variant | @swash | @ornaments | @annotation
<feature-value> = <integer>+
```
where `<rule-list>` can only contain `<feature-value-block>` rules,
`<feature-type>` takes all font specific property names of
`font-variant-alternates` prefixed with '@', `<declaration-list>` can
only contain feature value definition properties holding
`<feature-value>` values and the `<integer>` values in
`<feature-value>` denote the feature indices.
The references to these syntax definitions should then link to them.
Sebastian
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/624 using your GitHub
account
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2016 09:48:29 UTC