- From: Sergio via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:07:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
svillar has just created a new issue for
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:
== [css-grid] Confusing definition of auto repeat tracks computation
==
Section 7.2.2.2 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#auto-repeat
specifies how to compute the number of auto-repeat tracks depending on
some factors. It turns out that it is subject to different
interpretations.
Let's translate it first to pseudocode (I'm skipping some things like
using 1 if any repetion overflows for the sake of simplicity)
if (size or max-size are specified)
use size or max-size
else
if min-size is definite
use min-size
At least is what we have understood in Chromium and WebKit when we
implemented it. This means that we always use size or max-size if any
of them are definite, and *only* the min-size if both of them are
indefinite.
However it seems that FF is doing it differently according to Mats'
comment here
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=648814#c2. He
considers that min-size should be always considered in the computation
if it's definite. Which interpretation is correct?
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/598 using your GitHub
account
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:07:41 UTC