- From: Takayoshi Kochi via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:43:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Okay, I understand that comment (`/**/`) can be inserted to a point within a combinator would not be much persuading argument with your examples, and I don't care whether we should be strict about LR(1) or LR(1+). So I do not have a strong opinion to make `>>` and `>>>` distinct tokens. @hayatoito @rune-opera @tim-loh do you have any concerns if we go without these tokens? My gut feeling is (as one who implemented the parsing part for `>>>` in Blink) it doesn't make any difference whether `>>>` is a single token or 3 tokens *outside* the combinator parsing function. But I'm not sure - e.g. when `calc()` supports `>>` as a operator, or something that I'm not aware of. -- GitHub Notification of comment by TakayoshiKochi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/712#issuecomment-263481921 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 05:43:34 UTC