W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax] '>>' and '>>>' should be a token

From: Takayoshi Kochi via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:43:27 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-263481921-1480398206-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Okay, I understand that comment (`/**/`) can be inserted to a point 
within a combinator would not be much persuading argument with your 
examples, and I don't care whether we should be strict about LR(1) or 
LR(1+). So I do not have a strong opinion to make `>>` and `>>>` 
distinct tokens.

@hayatoito @rune-opera @tim-loh do you have any concerns if we go 
without these tokens? My gut feeling is (as one who implemented the 
parsing part for `>>>` in Blink) it doesn't make any difference 
whether `>>>` is a single token or 3 tokens *outside* the combinator 
parsing function.  But I'm not sure - e.g. when `calc()` supports `>>`
 as a operator, or something that I'm not aware of.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by TakayoshiKochi
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/712#issuecomment-263481921 
using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 05:43:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:05 UTC