- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:12:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The proposal sounds sane to me. I’d like also to make it clear that browsers should be allowed (but not required to) make `wrap` do the same kind of multi-line processing as `multi-line`. The alternative being requiring that `wrap` invokes the greedy line breaking behavior, which I don’t think would be good. Basically, I think that the two values should have the following meeting: - `wrap`: lines do wrap, algorithm is UA defined, UA **may** take multiple lines into account, UA **may bias for speed over good layout** - `multi-line`: lines do wrap, algorithm is UA defined, UA **should** take multiple lines into account, UA **should bias for good layout over speed** -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/672#issuecomment-263478188 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 05:12:22 UTC