- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:52:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think actually there's a Bikeshed command that fills in missing fields with "see individual properties"; I should probably use that. My concern about this is that, as we use shorthands more and more frequently, it makes it much more difficult for authors who are referencing the specs to look things up. To the extent that the value of the field is simple, I think it's more usable to leave these fields filled in. The main downside is the potential for out-of-sync errors. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/764#issuecomment-263102363 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 27 November 2016 04:52:09 UTC