- From: aaaxx via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:24:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Just to confirm I'm reading this right: 1. You're thinking about declaring `font-weight` by setting the base stroke's width to some percentage of em or x-height? 2. Abbreviations mean: - `sw` is <var>stroke width</var> - `bs` is <var>base stroke</var> (i.e. the thicker stroke) - `hs` is <var>hair stroke</var> (i.e. the thinnest stroke, obviously) 3. The hypothetical `stroke-width` would be an alternative way of setting weight, by giving either base- or hair stroke a certain width? (Isn't base stroke here redundant if I understood point no. 1 correctly? Or do you mean leaving `font-weight` as currently specified and using stroke widths for manipulating weight just in this new descriptor?) -- GitHub Notification of comment by aaaxx Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/459#issuecomment-261136385 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:24:40 UTC