W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] editorial: typo in §6.2.2. Absolutely-Positioned Boxes

From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 22:11:42 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-258560419-1478297500-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Also, are you sure you really mean `normal` in those places?
The text makes more sense to me if you replace `normal` with `stretch`
 there,
i.e. "Otherwise, when `align-self` is not `stretch`, and not `normal` 
behaving as `stretch`, ...".
Currently, it seems to say that an explicit `align-self:stretch` 
should have `fit-content` sizing,
which seems odd.  I'd expect it to have `fill-available` sizing.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/682#issuecomment-258560419 
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 22:11:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:05 UTC