- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 11:26:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It seems we're all agreed on the problem statement, and that a solution needs to be found. To be clear, I have no attachment at all to the syntax of the example solution i included in my original post (and btw @tabatkins the 300 and 500 were meant to be weights). I just want some way to indicate that various parameters should be different as you fall back to one of the named fonts. I think that once you get to sans-serif all bets are off. It's just a question of specifying comparative parameters for the named font families in the fallback list. I also suspect that the alternative parameters could be specified comparatively against the first item in the list of font-family fonts, or you could have some special rule which allows you to specify absolute font sizes (for example) and that then works out the ratios for you. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/126#issuecomment-221240655 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 11:26:09 UTC