W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-round-display][mediaquery] Properly define 'viewport-fit'

From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:42:06 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-229564489-1467265324-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Defining this in terms of "what would be reachable / visible on a 
rectangular display" is probably the right way to deal with it: this 
is actually the intent, so why not spell it out, and it is a 
verifiable non-fuzzy claim (regardless of whether an automated testing
 setup is easy to put together).

I am less sure about restricting it to “significant” content. While I 
agree that insignificant things, by definition, aren't important, 
agreeing on what's significant is trickier, and I think the fuzziness 
that this introduces in the definition will cause more problems than 
it solves.

GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 05:42:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:40:59 UTC