- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:03:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't really like that resolution, but I guess I can live with it. However, I have a few questions about what it means practically: 1) Does that mean we should remove the prefixes from our specs? -webkit-user-select was removed from the compat spec once it was added to ours, as that is (as far as I understand) the way the compat spec deals with things that have graduated into their main spec 2) What about other non standard names that don't have a prefix? The standard `overflow-wrap` property has a `word-wrap` initially proprietary name, which is now supported by multiple browsers. Except for the fact that the name doesn't include the word webkit, the situation is pretty much the same. Should we keep it in our spec, or move it to the compat spec? 3) The compat spec does not specify how aliasing works, it just says you need to alias. Our specs say: “must treat as a shorthand” for `word-wrap`, and “up to the UA, but should consider doing it as a shorthand” for `-webkit-user-select`. Do we preserve that information? Where? -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/247#issuecomment-229547873 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 03:03:57 UTC