- From: Brad Kemper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:05:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It wasn't so much that I wanted to write a different spec. It was that I would expect properties with "float" in their name to be based on existing (inline) floats, and I was describing a theoretical spec that was based on how existing (inline) floats could gain a second dimension without changing what the first dimension meant in combination with the second. I'm perfectly fine with page "floats" being based on exclusions, as long as they are separate from existing floats, and don't mix exclusions into the same property names, or use 'float' as part of the property name. They should have property names and spec terminology that doesn't use the word "float" for anything, other than to point out the ways that floats and exclusions are similar or different. I didn't like the mixing of the two distinct methods of stacking and wrapping elements. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bradkemper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/220#issuecomment-227903579 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 23:05:11 UTC