W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] is #42 a valid ID selector?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:31:38 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-227244821-1466451098-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

It's just something I accidentally dropped when converting the 
grammar.  Fixed now (with a prose requirement below the main grammar).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/202#issuecomment-227244821 
using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 20 June 2016 19:31:41 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: fantasai via GitHub: "Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Missing Figure 1 in Spec"
Previous message: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Closed: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] is #42 a valid ID selector?"
In reply to: Douglas Stockwell via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [selectors] is #42 a valid ID selector?"
Next in thread: ericrannaud via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] is #42 a valid ID selector?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:40:59 UTC