W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2016

[csswg-drafts] [css-values] OK to have fragment-only URLs always refer to the host document?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 20:31:46 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-158448855-1464985905-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
tabatkins has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-values] OK to have fragment-only URLs always refer to the host
 document? ==
I just wrote <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values/#local-urls> to 
discharge the resolution we made at the SF f2f, and while writing it I
 ran into one bit that we hadn't actually discussed: what to do about 
fragment-only URLs *in an external stylesheet*.  (The discussion we 
had at the f2f was just about URLs that would normally resolve to an 
element in the document, which implies the CSS is inline.)

I went ahead and defined that fragment-only URLs *always* refer to the
 host document, because it seems useful for SVG, and because CSS 
documents have no fragment semantics and don't look like they ever 
will.  Is this ok?

Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/165 using your GitHub 
account
Received on Friday, 3 June 2016 20:31:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:30:20 UTC