W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2016

[csswg-drafts] [css-flex] which margin definition for intrinsic sizing?

From: Greg Whitworth via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 03:38:06 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-168244454-1469763484-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
gregwhitworth has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-flex] which margin definition for intrinsic sizing? ==
I'm opening this on behalf of Christian Biesinger as he posted a 
question to www-style. Moving the thread here:

> I learned today that not all browsers ignore percentage margins for
> intrinsic width computations. In this testcase:
> 
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0A%3Cstyle%3E%0A%20%20div%20%7B%20float%3A%20left%3B%20border%3A%20solid%3B%20%7D%0A%20%20p%20%7B%20margin%3A%2010%25%3B%20%7D%0A%3C%2Fstyle%3E%0A%0A%3Cdiv%3E%0A%20%20%3Cp%3Ethisisaword%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3C%2Fdiv%3E
> 
> Chrome/IE 11/Edge overflow the box, whereas in Firefox they don't. I
> actually have no idea how they implement this! I'm also unsure what 
the
> spec requires...
> 
> -Christian
> 
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Christian Biesinger 
<cbiesinger@google.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> >
> > Question about 
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#intrinsic-main-sizes
> >
> > This algorithm wants to use the outer flex base size. But in 
general, for
> > intrinsic sizing purposes, percentage margins get treated as zero.
 Should
> > that be used here as well?
> >
> > Also, is there a reason why min-size is ignored for the purpose of
 this
> > algorithm?
> >
> > thanks,
> > -Christian
> >



Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/359 using your GitHub 
account
Received on Friday, 29 July 2016 03:38:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:00 UTC