W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Possible reconsideration of CSS terminology in terms of design?

From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:51:31 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-235900299-1469713890-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
[CSS Multi-column Layout](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-multicol/) also
 uses the term 'gap' and that spec. is already widely implemented. 
Also, 'gap' is easier understandable than 'gutter'. Last but not 
least, it is shorter than 'gutter'.

So, while it may technically not be 100% correct, I think 'gap' should
 be kept for simplicity and consistency with other CSS modules, but I 
don't have a strong feeling about that.


GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 13:51:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:00 UTC