- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:50:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Looks like it was decided in the telcon today to accept fantasai's suggested syntax: ``` color( [ <colorspace>? [ <number>+ | <string> ] [ / <alpha> ]? ]# , <color>? ) ``` (I'm happy with this; the comma usage is to separate fallbacks, which corresponds to the "separating repetitions" usage that CSS normally uses commas for. I still don't think the slash is *necessary*, but I'm fine with having it, and doing so means it's clear where the alpha is even if you use a `<number>` for alpha, or if we in the future allow the colorspace arguments to be `<percentage>`s.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/266#issuecomment-235699494 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 19:50:15 UTC