- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:27:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I didn’t find relevant documentation for [...] Vivliostyle As for version 2016.7, Vivliostyle supports all the page sizes specified in the spec (and only these): https://github.com/vivliostyle/vivliostyle.js/blob/64c0766361f87ac9c8c8ddf6aef83a60931da715/resources/validation.txt#L297 : `a5 | a4 | a3 | b5 | b4 | jis-b5 | jis-b4 | letter | legal | ledger`. The dimensions match those specified in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page/#typedef-page-size-page-size > Since ledger (not tabloid) is currently specified as a portrait format, it should be clarified whether the implementations (intentionally) are non-comformant there and if it’s a bug in the spec. I believe the spec is clear that all formats are defined in portrait orientation, and Vivliostyle's implementation conforms to that. > I believe it could be beneficial to have <paper-size> accept two keywords, an optional one for the system (e.g. JIS) and a mandatory one for the size (e.g. B4). I don't think I'd be in favor of this approach. It makes it possible to specify paper sizes that don't actually exist (`jis ledger`?), and while we could certainly define them, I don't see the benefit. As for including more paper sizes in the spec, it is very cheap to implemented and there may be occasional demand, so we wouldn't be opposed to it, but it is also very easy for authors to work with actual dimensions if they don't have the keywords, so the need isn't that pressing either. We have yet to feel market pressure in supporting these other sizes, but if/when we do, we'll be sure to report back to the CSSWG. It was different for JIS-B5 and JIS-B4, since there's more demand for these than for the unprefixed (implying ISO) B5 and B4, so adding there helped alleviate some confusion. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/328#issuecomment-233506098 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2016 01:27:36 UTC