W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions] spring() timing function

From: Maciej Stachowiak via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:52:13 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-232556121-1468471931-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
If you expose zeta instead of the damping coefficient then perhaps it 
would make more sense to expose the natural frequency (ω0) instead of 
k/m. Besides the fact that these choices may make spring parameters 
easier to understand and author, it is also convenient that zeta is 
dimensionless and omega-nought is a frequency, which CSS has a unit 

GitHub Notification of comment by othermaciej
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 04:52:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:00 UTC