Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions] spring() timing function

If you expose zeta instead of the damping coefficient then perhaps it 
would make more sense to expose the natural frequency (ω0) instead of 
k/m. Besides the fact that these choices may make spring parameters 
easier to understand and author, it is also convenient that zeta is 
dimensionless and omega-nought is a frequency, which CSS has a unit 

GitHub Notification of comment by othermaciej
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 04:52:20 UTC