- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:19:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm currently leaning towards no commas in color(), since the syntax allows keywords, has optional arguments, etc. which are more CSSy than traditional functions. But I also lean towards requiring the slash for readability, since as ChrisL points out, it's hard to visually parse a color consisting of all percentages. And imho percentages are the most natural way to represent a range between 0 and 1, so they should be comfortable to use for all of the color coordinates. [While we're at this, though, we should also review all our other functions for consistency. The comma-less syntax we're discussing here is consistent with the attr() function in V&U, but Grid's repeat(), for example, probably doesn't need its comma either.] -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/266#issuecomment-232490145 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:20:01 UTC