W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > August 2016

[csswg-drafts] [css-containment] reuse "ink overflow" terminology

From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:56:06 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-170423394-1470837364-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
frivoal has just created a new issue for 

== [css-containment] reuse "ink overflow" terminology ==
This is a follow up form 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0320.html which
 was left unresolved.

point 3 of item 
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-containment/#containment-layout says 

> If the contents of the element overflow the element, they must not 
project any "geometry" beyond the element’s normal bounds. In 
particular, any overflow must not be capable of causing the element’s 
ancestors to overflow; as far as the ancestors are concerned, the 
element is perfectly confined to its normal width×height bounds.

As far as I can tell, this is trying to define an effect identical to 
ink overflow, as defined in https://www.w3.org/TR/css-overflow-3/#ink.

Rather than redefining it, we should just reuse that term:
> If the contents of the element overflow the element, they must be 
treated as ink overflow

Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/396 using your GitHub 
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 13:56:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:01 UTC