- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:01:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Auto-generation of terminology indexes is being worked on, but it unfortunately doesn't really include CSS2.1. :) The sections of 2.1 that haven't been replaced are still canonical, fwiw. And in any case if there is a conflict we do try to update both specs. CSS3 modules that replace 2.1 sections are generally better written, so are better references, and are of course more complete where we have added new features; but CSS2.1 should not in any case be *wrong*. I'll close this issue for now, then. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/363#issuecomment-237059257 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 22:03:39 UTC