- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:04:22 -0700
- To: Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANh-dXkr-QJgaGi418pYws=HNmJAULm9WfVGooy_EGftRpAW4A@mail.gmail.com>
These posts about StratML feel like spam to me. Does anyone else get value out of them? Jeffrey On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 8:24 AM Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > I'll look forward to the discussion tomorrow. In the meantime, I: > > - updated the StratML rendition of IPTC's about statement, at > https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IPTC or, more specifically, > https://stratml.us/docs/IPTC2025.xml, > - created a StratML rendition of JournalList's about statement, at > https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#JRNL or, more specifically, > https://stratml.us/docs/JRNL.xml, and > - prompted ChatGPT for insight on Scott and Leonard's exchange > <https://chatgpt.com/share/68767239-7eb0-800b-9651-b18cfe53439f>. > > Owen Ambur > https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ > > > On Tuesday, July 15, 2025 at 02:20:50 AM EDT, Leonard Rosenthol < > lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote: > > > My comment about “out of date” is that the approach taking in the current > spec doesn’t follow what I would consider “current best practices” for such > work – so that if we were to look to bring something like trust.txt > forward, there are (breaking) changes required (IMO). > > > > Leonard > > > > *From: *Scott Yates <scott@journallist.net> > *Date: *Monday, July 14, 2025 at 10:43 PM > *To: *Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > *Cc: *Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke < > sandro.hawke@gmail.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Tzviya > Siegman <tzviya@w3.org>, Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk> > *Subject: *Re: Next CredWeb meeting in 48 hours! > > *EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.* > > > > Leonard, > > > > The movement with trust.txt has been with the new functionality that I'll > be talking about on Wednesday. It uses the current version of the spec. > That is, no updates were required of the spec for the new way to use it. > > > > In other words, what seems "out of date" to you seems "stable and > reliable" to me. > > > > -Scott Yates > > Founder > > JournalList.net <https://journallist.net/>, caretaker of the trust.txt > framework > > 202-742-6842 <(202)%20742-6842> > > Chair of W3C Credibility Group <https://www.w3.org/community/credibility/> > > Member IPTC <https://iptc.org/> and Rebuild Local News > <https://www.rebuildlocalnews.org/> > > Short Video Explanation of trust.txt <https://youtu.be/lunOBapQxpU> > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:47 AM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > wrote: > > Scott – is there a newer version of the specification? The one on the > site seems pretty out of date at this point… > > > > Leonard > > > > *From: *Scott Yates <scott@journallist.net> > *Date: *Monday, July 14, 2025 at 4:04 PM > *To: *Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org> > *Cc: *Sandro Hawke <sandro.hawke@gmail.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux < > dom@w3.org>, Tzviya Siegman <tzviya@w3.org>, Chris Needham < > chris.needham@bbc.co.uk> > *Subject: *Next CredWeb meeting in 48 hours! > > *EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.* > > > > Dear member of the CredWeb Community Group, > > > > The fourth in our series of Authentic Web Workshops is coming up 48 hours > after I click send on this email, (8 a.m. in California, 9 a.m. in my home > time zone in the mountains, 11 a.m. Eastern, 4 p.m. England, and 5 p.m. in > France.) > > > > (I know this time isn't great for Japan/Australia. If anyone there would > like, I'd be happy to repeat my presentation and take questions at a time > that works better for you. Just let me know.) > > > > The project going under the microscope for this meeting is trust.txt, > which happens to be my creation. Some of you have heard about trust.txt > before, but you'll still want to join us because we have a new feature... > For the first time in the history of the internet, there's a badge that can > be visible on a web page that can't be duplicated in a way that would > undermine trust. At least I can't imagine how it could be, but that's why > we're road testing it with this group. Many of you have seen other > well-intentioned efforts get misused, so I look forward to having you try > to poke holes in this. > > > > Before then, I'll be doing some additional documentation in github and > elsewhere. I would have done that before, but my life got somewhat > swallowed by a different project. > > > > I was the one behind the new Local Journalism Index > <https://muckrack.com/research/local-journalist-index>, which came out > last week. It got a ton of attention, which is great. It may not seem like > the number of journalists working in the country is related to a > trustworthy internet, but I think there's a direct correlation. The less > local news people have the more they need to fill the vacuum that's created > by the very human need to have a flow of information in. More journalists > fill that vacuum with more local news so it doesn't get filled with crap. > So, check it out if it is of interest to you, and after we're done with the > CredWeb meeting I'd be happy to stay after and answer any questions you may > have about that Index. > > > > Thanks very much, and I look forward to seeing you all on Wednesday! > > > > -Scott Yates > > Founder > > JournalList.net <https://journallist.net/>, caretaker of the trust.txt > framework > > 202-742-6842 <(202)%20742-6842> > > Chair of W3C Credibility Group <https://www.w3.org/community/credibility/> > > Member IPTC <https://iptc.org/> and Rebuild Local News > <https://www.rebuildlocalnews.org/> > > Short Video Explanation of trust.txt <https://youtu.be/lunOBapQxpU> > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2025 17:04:42 UTC