- From: Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:50:59 -0400
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Cc: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>, CredWeb CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA1s49WcTCFfhb8VugF-xq2dC9VxZ6o+1OKGfpvWXSAzQiO3fA@mail.gmail.com>
Annette Greiner wrote: "The idea of adding friction is a good one." We should also consider adding "friction" in responses to shared content. Today, it is often only possible to provide "grease" in the form of "Likes," but, without an ability to "Dislike," we can't apply friction. Similarly, our vocabulary for efficient terse responses is severely constrained. We can say we "Like" something but have no similarly efficient means to say that we either "Agree" or "Disagree." (Note: It should also be possible to "like" an argument because it is artfully presented while disagreeing with its conclusions. Or, to dislike an argument but to agree with it.) Commenting on web content often feels to me like participating in an authoritarian plebiscite where the only valid entry on a ballot is "Yes." When the votes are counted, we may see an impressive number of affirmative votes, but that number tells us nothing about the ideas' actual reception by the voters. The reality though is that providing grease-only, friction-free systems for discourse seems to satisfy the needs of platform providers. Likes give them an indication of engagement and they know that if "Dislike" or "Disagree" were supported, some number of people would be more circumspect in what they post and thus would engage less with the platform. While it would be unfortunate if people whose intent was sincere were intimidated, we may find that the social costs are greater if we continue to allow misinformation to remain largely unchallenged or to gain apparent legitimacy due to large "Like" counts, The Credibility Signals currently defined by this group are either neutral or useful only to provide grease, not friction. (i.e. what awards have been won, etc.) On the other hand, ClaimReview <https://www.claimreviewproject.com/> provides for a Rating <https://schema.org/Rating> value that can express both a bad rating (disagree?) or a good one (agree?), and gradations in between. I'd like to see such an ability to provide Ratings provided to those who would otherwise be limited to just providing grease via Like buttons or the existing Credibility SIgnals. bob wyman
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2021 01:52:23 UTC