Re: CredWeb Agenda 16 August

Regrets from me as well, but I hope to be able to join the next meetings
cause I'm very enthusiastic about this reboot. I've added my updates to the
shared doc.

Davide

Il giorno lun 16 ago 2021 alle ore 15:31 Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
ha scritto:

> I will have to miss most of this meeting, but I am paying attention and
> hope to participate going forward.
>
>
>
> *Tzviya Siegman*
>
> Information Standards Principal
>
> Wiley
>
> 201-748-6884
>
> tsiegman@wiley.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Sandro Hawke <sandro@hawke.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 15, 2021 4:20 PM
> *To:* Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CredWeb Agenda 16 August
>
>
>
> ⛔
>
> This is an external email.
>
> Meeting in approx 24 hours.  Hoping you can all make it.  Agenda +
> Meeting Record
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1fZNExB1LyZ-J274C3fuParU9ClnjjbDf_ljKYP3JlG0/edit*__;Iw!!N11eV2iwtfs!41GDf2jXUXF6B_ygTlfTwzrN1ONuil8yuaYSucc0lP5IcQ4_TLvD3Fzdxwdz_A$>
>
> When
>
> 16
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CredWeb&iso=20210816T15&p1=43&ah=1__;!!N11eV2iwtfs!41GDf2jXUXF6B_ygTlfTwzrN1ONuil8yuaYSucc0lP5IcQ4_TLvD3Fzk1TDQxg$>
>
> August 2021 3pm ET
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CredWeb&iso=20210816T15&p1=43&ah=1__;!!N11eV2iwtfs!41GDf2jXUXF6B_ygTlfTwzrN1ONuil8yuaYSucc0lP5IcQ4_TLvD3Fzk1TDQxg$>
>
> for 60 minutes
>
> Video
>
> https://zoom.us/j/706868147
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/zoom.us/j/706868147__;!!N11eV2iwtfs!41GDf2jXUXF6B_ygTlfTwzrN1ONuil8yuaYSucc0lP5IcQ4_TLvD3FytjpPADA$>
>
> Please try to be on camera
>
>
>
> Remember the open poll for the next meeting time
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/doodle.com/poll/rpg4gu6syu3nhpr4__;!!N11eV2iwtfs!41GDf2jXUXF6B_ygTlfTwzrN1ONuil8yuaYSucc0lP5IcQ4_TLvD3Fzo7Y-LbA$>
> (Aug 25 or 26).
>
> I'm thinking we'll start the voting for next chair at that meeting (Aug 25
> or 26), unless someone has a good reason to do it otherwise. Voting before
> then doesn't seem right, since people wont have had a chance to hear from
> the candidates.
>
>      -- Sandro
>