Re: Agenda, 30-May-2018

Quick follow-up to yesterday's meeting. We wondered if an analysis of
ClaimReview data would enable us to tease out an aggregate credibility
score for the domains that are the targets of reviews by the various
producers of ClaimReview data.

But, as discussed in
https://misinfocon.com/how-web-annotation-can-help-readers-spot-fact-checked-claims-ccbf9246dd68,
the target domains are not consistently or reliably present in the
ClaimReview data. That's gotta get fixed. It doesn't matter how a schema is
defined if key slots like that aren't carrying useful signals.

Jon

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> Sorry, forgot to send Agenda link yesterday.   Meeting today at usual time
> and location.
>
> Might be a short meeting, not much structure, just planning to talk about
> ideas for what could be done in the Reputation space.  Should folks publish
> lists of who they think is trustworthy and/or who is not?
>
> https://credweb.org/agenda/20180530.html
>
> And reminder: next week, subgroup meeting (on Inspection / 3rd Party
> Indicators) on MONDAY (one hour earlier that our Wednesday slot), and no
> meeting Wednesday.
>
> Also reminder: please update July dates! https://doodle.com/poll/qudimi
> eecq8kapdn
>
> Thanks!
>
>         -- Sandro
>
>
>