- From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 21:06:59 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
Regrets, but I am really interested in the concept of Reputation. I am wondering what we can do with concepts like provenance and reputation. In the Scholarly world, reputation can mean a lot. The journal in which someone is published and the society with which one is associated carry a lot of weight. I look forward to the minutes. Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com -----Original Message----- From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 3:28 PM To: Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org> Subject: Upcoming meeting schedule Some changes for this week and next: 1. This week's meeting will be about Reputation, not Inspection (as previously planned), because critical folks for the Inspection discussion won't be available. I don't have anyone scheduled to speak on Reputation technology, so I think we'll just brainstorm. If anyone has a specific proposal they'd like to present as a straw design/starting point, please speak up. And of course we're still trying to gather data to help help scope a charter and near-future work. 2. Next week's normal time is a conflict for those of us attending the Harvard Shorenstein meeting (including me and An) so we're canceling the usual Wednesday meeting. 3. Making progress on Inspection is somewhat urgent, however, so we're going to try using a different meeting time for that: Monday, June 4, Noon Eastern (which was a good slot on the meeting time poll). Let's call that an Inspection Subgroup meeting. More details, soon. Rough plan is to dig into some of the most promising indicators. I believe these changes are reflect on the gcal, ical, and website. Please let me know if you spot anything missing. Thanks! - Sandro
Received on Monday, 28 May 2018 21:07:36 UTC