- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 13:47:33 -0700
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-credibility@w3.org, Mevan Babakar <mevan@fullfact.org>
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 20:48:10 UTC
+Cc: Mevan To follow up on the "where next with ClaimReview" side of things, I've just linked some Sept 2017 that came out of my talking with the Archive.org TV factchecking team. This is tracked in the Schema.org github issue tracker at https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1686 - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_YxG42aEbhu33ZoZDPX0oTkKN7tr1B_5gYH33LJYIZk/edit# It is a bit braindumpy but seemed better to share now than hoard in the hope of tidying it up later Dan On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 09:00, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > Meeting as usual, about an hour from now > > I've added more structure in the agenda to the discussion on > Corroboration / fact-checking > > https://credweb.org/agenda/20180523.html > > -- Sandro > > >
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 20:48:10 UTC