Re: Agenda 22 August: claim sightings, identifying publishers

On 08/21/2018 12:29 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Last we spoke, you thought the idea we're moving towards at schema.org 
> <http://schema.org>, allowing and encouraging IDs on the 
> schema.org/Claim <http://schema.org/Claim> type. At the time you said 
> this was a bad idea. Could you articulate your thoughts here in 
> writing for the record? This design addresses scenarios including 
> sites like Snopes that want some but not all of their data public, but 
> joinable with info shared through other channels. Also cases such as 
> translation of verbatim and paraphrased claim text without mixing up 
> which of those it is.
>


I think we want that kind of discussion on github, not in email, so ... 
you finally pushed me into setting up an area-2 repo, and raising this 
as issue-1.  (Sorry that took so long.)

https://github.com/w3c/cred-claims/issues/1

Folks, if you care about this topic, I suggest you WATCH that repo.

Also, check out the README, where I tried to briefly enumerate what I 
know about Area-2.

    -- Sandro

> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, 09:22 Sandro Hawke, <sandro@w3.org 
> <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>     Meeting as usual tomorrow: https://credweb.org/agenda/20180822
>
>     Two general discussion/brainstorming topics, continuing with two
>     of the
>     more promising recent threads:
>
>     * Creating an ecosystem of claim sightings (Area 2)
>
>     * Creating an ecosystem of securely identified publishers (Area 3 + 4)
>
>     Also, a question for anyone reading this who doesn't usually attend
>     meetings: would you be interested in having a video recording of the
>     meeting available?  It would be a bit like a long-form podcast, I
>     suppose.
>
>     See y'all tomorrow,
>
>          -- Sandro
>
>